Posts
819
Comments
458
Trackbacks
51
January 2003 Entries
I thought the best part of the State of the Union was the $1.2 billion for fuel cell vehicles. That's a step in the right direction! There's another good article here.
posted @ Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:49 PM | Feedback (0)
Customers who wear clothes also shop for:
  • Clean Underwear from Amazon's Target Store
  • Ladybug Rain Boots from Amazon's Nordstrom Store
  • Pet Socks from Amazon's Urban Outfitters Store
  • Helicopter Sleepwear Sets for Baby from Amazon's Old Navy Store

This is what Amazon has on my "customized homepage". It says "Customers who wear clothes also shop for:". I'm really curious about what customers that don't wear clothes shop for. They probably don't like the Clean Underwear Amazon has decided I need. I'm not entirely sure what to make of the Pet Socks. Are they socks for my pet? I don't have a pet. "Helicopter Sleepwear Sets for Baby." I have no idea where that came from. "Customers who wear clothes also shop for" is just such a great quote.

Update: The Pet Socks are little cute socks with a picture of a pet -- or at least some type of animal. The Clean Underwear link just takes you to regular underwear. One would assume it's as clean as any other new underwear. Oddly enough if you search Amazon for Clean Underwear you don't get any clothing. You get some Books, Medical Supplies, Lifestyle & Gifts (whatever that is) and Industrial Supplies. Industrial Supplies?

Updated Update: And of course, now that I clicked on those products they are all over my home page! Grrr!

posted @ Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:54 PM | Feedback (0)
Hans Blix delivered his report to the UN yesterday. I'd take a second to read the report if I were you. I'm not sure if this is the entire report or just the executive summary yet. We'll probably hear something about it in the State of the Union tonight.

People keep asking for a "smoking gun" in Iraq. They want us to find a few hundred tons of anthrax or some such. Iraq has had FOUR YEARS to hide this stuff. What makes people think we're going to find it? Iraq has over 400,000 square kilometers of land. And they've been hiding stuff for FOUR YEARS.

The document indicates that 13,000 chemical bombs were dropped by the Iraqi Air Force between 1983 and 1988, while Iraq has declared that 19,500 bombs were consumed during this period. Thus, there is a discrepancy of 6,500 bombs. The amount of chemical agent in these bombs would be in the order of about 1,000 tonnes. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we must assume that these quantities are now unaccounted for.

They say they've destroyed all these. And the chemicals that went in them but they can't offer any proof. They can't even offer a hint of proof. They can't even show they spent money to do this. They certainly didn't do it under international supervision like South Africa. And what are inspectors finding?

I might further mention that inspectors have found at another site a laboratory quantity of thiodiglycol, a mustard gas precursor.

I did some searching on Google and the largest use of thiodiglycol is to make mustard gas. I found one web site that mentioned certain limited industrial uses but apparently most people don't use it because it's so dangerous. Everyone else described it as a blister-agent used to make sulphur mustard.

Please take a second and read this document. It's time to decide if we allow someone like Saddam Hussein to have chemical and biological weapons. He's gassed his own people. He tortures his own people. You may be opposed to war but are you in favor of Saddam Hussein?

posted @ Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:49 AM | Feedback (0)
I don't have any way to directly link to a single post on AndrewSullivan.com but this one needs to be live on. I highlighted the relevant sentences but didn't want to take them out of context.
Now that the European powers have tipped their hand and will do all they can diplomatically to forestall or derail war, we can at least reassess where we are. The participation of the French and Germans was never militarily significant. It would have been great to have gotten U.N. sanction for the war against terror, but given the disparate interests of the various great powers, it was always a long shot. So once again, it's the English-speaking peoples versus the despots. And there's a reason for this. Terrorism is a far greater threat to countries founded on liberty. Terror's ability to cripple free societies, their travel and communications, their limited government, their cherished personal liberties, is felt far more keenly in the English-speaking world. That's why the civil liberties enthusiasts on the right and left are both right and wrong. Right to defend what they defend. Wrong to think that John Ashcroft is a greater threat in this respect than al Qaeda.

Sullivan is one smart guy. I hadn't ever considered the idea that all societies aren't equally affected by terrorism. Open societies have more to lose and are more easily disrupted. Interesting idea.

posted @ Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:36 AM | Feedback (0)
Condi Rice brings her "A" game to Why We Know Iraq Is Lying, an editorial written for the NY Times.
The list of people involved with weapons of mass destruction programs, which the United Nations required Iraq to provide, ends with those who worked in 1991 -- even though the United Nations had previously established that the programs continued after that date. Interviews with scientists and weapons officials identified by inspectors have taken place only in the watchful presence of the regime's agents. Given the duplicitous record of the regime, its recent promises to do better can only be seen as an attempt to stall for time.
It adds a little more detail to the actions of Iraq. I wish the press was reporting on this a little better. Or maybe I just need to read the right stories. Anyway, it looks like Iraq isn't cooperating much at all.
posted @ Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:30 AM | Feedback (0)
Did you watch the anti-war demonstrations over the weekend? Did you know that they were organized by a Communist organization? From Marching with Stalinists ...
The left has hardened itself around the core value of a furious, permanent, reactionary opposition to the devil-state America, which stands as the paramount evil of the world and the paramount threat to the world, and whose aims must be thwarted even at the cost of supporting fascists and tyrants.
It's interesting to see the left, the uber-liberals, swinging to support dictatorships.
posted @ Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:26 AM | Feedback (0)
CNN is reporting Arafat says he backs new leaders in his party. Tell me that isn't the most misleading headline of the day. Does CNN just print Palestinian propaganda unedited now? Of course he says that. But what does he do?
The first and only Palestinian Authority elections took place in January 1996. The Palestinian Authority was scheduled to hold elections in May 1999, according to the Oslo agreement, but the postponement of peace talks delayed the vote.

How could postponement of peace talks delay an election? Seems rather convenient for Arafat if you ask me.

The Palestinian Authority then set the date for January 20, 2003, which also has been put off indefinitely.

Hmmmm. More postponing of elections. This isn't a democracy. This is a regime that doesn't allow free speech or rule of law or the right to vote. And check out this paragraph:

On what was supposed to be the first election day for Palestinians in seven years, Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat said Monday that he is actively pursuing new politicians within his Fatah party to take over his post.

Is Arafat picking the person to take his place? That doesn't sound much like democracy to me.

posted @ Monday, January 20, 2003 9:02 AM | Feedback (0)
Andrew Sullivan takes on Sheryl Crow's anti-war stance in Sequined Dissent. And it isn't pretty.
Ms Crow showed up at the latest public relations exercise for the music industry, the American Music Awards, dressed in a sequined t-shirt with the message "War Is Not The Answer" blazoned across it. One word: Sequins? Here is a fabulously wealthy, famously cute singer, telling the impoverished men, women and children tortured, gassed and abused by one of the most disgusting dictators of all time that any attempt to rescue or liberate them is "not the answer." And she expresses this message in sequins. She couldn't afford diamonds?

Aren't there still a bunch of movie stars that promised to leave the country if Bush won? Ok, maybe "movie stars" is a little much for any of the Baldwin brothers and that's a little off-topic but I'm just remind of those idiots by this article. I'm glad Sheryl Crow's extensive education on politics is shining through. I'd really like to see what she suggests. Can't she just stick to singing? I really do like her music.

posted @ Monday, January 20, 2003 8:06 AM | Feedback (0)
Nothing like a little book burning among friends.
In front of a crowd of more than 1,000 people, officials doused gasoline on the materials piled up in a bazaar in Peshawar. The police chief, Tanveer ul-Haq Sipra, then set the pile on fire.

"We are determined to fulfill our promises about Islamization and cleaning up society," said Maulana Haji Ihsan ul-Haq, general-secretary of the Muthida Majlis-e-Amal, or United Action Forum.

A certain group of Islamic Pakistani fundamentalists seem to be trying to get back to the dark ages.

posted @ Monday, January 20, 2003 8:01 AM | Feedback (0)
Missiles and Palestinian Opinion Polls is another great Orson Scott Card article. The first part is about sort of about missiles but really seems to cover civil liberties in times of crisis. The second part is about democracy in "Palestine"
If given a chance -- a period of peace in which to develop roots-up democracy, without fear of coercion by bully-boy hitlerettes like Saddam or Assad or Arafat -- human beings prefer democracy every time.

Card says all kinds of interesting things in this article.

What chance have the Palestinians had? Under Israeli occupation, they had only very limited self-government -- and any Arab leader who tried to govern well, without making war with the Israelis, was assassinated or hounded from office.

And when the Israelis pulled back, there was no grace period of real democracy -- Arafat and his goons moved right in, brooking no opposition to their dictatorship. The outward forms of democracy were respected, but anyone who dissented from Arafat's "government" was given a quick reminder that freedom of speech or the press was only available under Israeli rule.

He also covers quite a bit of history and the situation in Palestine prior to the Jews arrival. He says some things I wish I had the courage to say. Pretty outspoken guy!

posted @ Sunday, January 19, 2003 11:08 PM | Feedback (0)
Have you seen that really cool commerical where Michael Jordan plays himself in a game of one-on-one? Here's an article about how they made it.
posted @ Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:35 PM | Feedback (0)
A modified version of anthrax appears to kill cancer cells. Who would have thought?
posted @ Wednesday, January 15, 2003 12:37 PM | Feedback (0)
I keep forgetting that Orson Scott Card is really smart. He has great article titled Why We Won't Invade North Korea.
"Why are we preparing to invade Iraq, which has no nukes yet, when we're using diplomacy with North Korea, which actually has them?"

Of course, you can take that as a self-answering question. Let's see -- which is safer to invade, the country that almost has nukes, or the country that already has them?

It's a really, really thoughtful discussion of why we need to handle North Korea and Iraq differently. And it provides a detailed approach to what may be going on in these negotiations. The article had some surprising conclusions that I hadn't read about before.
posted @ Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:41 PM | Feedback (0)
Now here's an interesting technical article. Imagine replacing your phone with an "Internet Phone". We've been hearing about it and it's getting closer. Not to Missouri just yet ... but closer. The article is about Customer Networks and starts with the fax revolution passing FedEx's ZapMail by and ends with predictions of doom for the phone company.
There was simply no competition. ZapMail looked good next to FedEx's physical delivery option, but compared to the advantages enjoyed by the owners of fax machines, it was laughable. If the phone network offered cheap service, it was better to buy a device to tap directly into that than to allow FedEx to overcharge for an interface to that network that created no additional value. The competitive force that killed ZapMail was the common sense of its putative users.

And Southwestern Bell is going to face the same problems when we can attach our own phones to the Internet.

posted @ Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:06 PM | Feedback (0)
Streamlining Government!
Panel Proposes Overhauling Federal Government. It's about friggin time! I really like a few of their suggestions.
Other federal departments should be similarly realigned, the commission said. For example, 13 Cabinet departments run 342 economic development programs, 50 federal agencies are involved in the war on drugs, and 11 agencies run 90 early childhood programs.

I also like that the panel is made of a good cross-section of the political spectrum. And I was curious what Donna Shalala had been up to lately.

posted @ Tuesday, January 07, 2003 1:46 PM | Feedback (19)
And Happy New Year!
posted @ Wednesday, January 01, 2003 6:31 PM | Feedback (0)
Time Magazine's Best Pictures of the Year for 2002 is up.
posted @ Wednesday, January 01, 2003 1:46 PM | Feedback (0)