Posts
819
Comments
458
Trackbacks
51
March 2003 Entries
So it turns out the Cool Photo of the Day I linked to on March 5th was a hoax. Or at least a photshopped combination of two pictures. Snopes has the details. Thanks Rich. Still a darn cool photo though. And Snopes is always a great site to explore.
posted @ Monday, March 31, 2003 5:02 PM | Feedback (0)
I don't usually read the ArabNews.com website for any real news. I usually don't read it all. They have too many stories that seem to be propoganda. So I was suprised to see an article talking about Iraqis that want the US/UK to depose Saddam.
The people I spoke with at Umm Qasr said they were happy about the removal of Saddam, as he had held them in terror for years. They took me to see the local Baath Party headquarters. They told me that many bad things happened there and that most of those picked up in the middle of the night and taken to that building were never seen again.

If the Saudi papers are reporting this much, I'm guessing the truth is even stronger. Who knows though. The article goes on to say

I asked several what they thought of the US/UK plan to remove Saddam. They told me: "Now that they have started to remove him, they cannot stop. If they do, then we are all as good as dead. He still has informants in Umm Qasr and he knows who is against him and who isn't."

When asked about what they think of this war, most Iraqis said that they were against the loss of innocent life and the destruction of their cities, but they seemed adamant about the removal of Saddam. They were happy about the "liberation" of Umm Qasr but were disappointed in the US/UK for not keeping their promises to provide humanitarian aid.

Good points all. I think the US really screwed up when we encourage the Iraqis to revolt in the previous Gulf War and then didn't support them.

posted @ Monday, March 31, 2003 4:53 PM | Feedback (0)
Every now and then an article comes along that really changes how I think about the world. My of them seem to be written by Fareed Zakaria. His articles alone are worth the price of a Newsweek subscription. His latest is The Arrogant Empire. The cover of the Newsweek it arrived in screamed "Why America scares the wolrd and what to do about it".
Watching the tumult around the world, it's evident that what is happening goes well beyond this particular crisis. Many people, both abroad and in America, fear that we are at some kind of turning point, where well-established mainstays of the global orde--the Western Alliance, European unity, the United Nation--seem to be cracking under stress. These strains go well beyond the matter of Iraq, which is not vital enough to wreak such damage. In fact, the debate is not about Saddam anymore. It is about America and its role in the new world. To understand the present crisis, we must first grasp how the rest of the world now perceives American power.

One of my complaints over the last few weeks was that many of the anti-war protests were really anti-America or anti-Bush protests. And that is exactly what they were. The article also talks about Bush's diplomatic failures.

In its first year the administration withdrew from five international treaties--and did so as brusquely as it could. It reneged on virtually every diplomatic effort that the Clinton administration had engaged in, from North Korea to the Middle East, often overturning public statements from Colin Powell supporting these efforts. It developed a language and diplomatic style that seemed calculated to offend the world. Key figures in the administration rarely traveled, foreign visitors were treated to perfunctory office visits, and state dinners were unheard of. On an annual basis, George W. Bush has visited fewer foreign countries than any president in 40 years. Still, he does better than Dick Cheney, who has been abroad only once since becoming vice president.

And then he wonders why the other countries don't support him. I argue with a friend about Bush fairly regularly. He's pretty anti-Bush. I usually take the other side. It's not that I'm pro-Bush but that I'm anti-Gore. I'll certainly have to rethink those arguements now.

So take a minute and read the article. Or take a few minutes. It's well worth it. You'll come out with a better understanding of why the world reacts to America the way they do. And if you're like me, you'll be rethinking some beliefs on Bush and America's role in the world. Maybe one of these administrations will hire Fareed as a foreign policy expert. Here's hoping!

posted @ Sunday, March 23, 2003 8:31 PM | Feedback (0)
Ah, those crazy human shields.
"But nobody can tell me that we haven't been an outstanding success," said Eubanks, who has been living at the Dura Electrical Power Plant, which supplies a third of Baghdad's electricity and was bombed in the Gulf War. "We were poorly organized, but we lurched forward."

Success? War is still going on as far as I can tell. Even the Iraqis think these folks are crazy. Could these people do anything more to help a brutal dictator? For people that support peace they also support one of the largest mass murderers on the planet.

"We have a bad impression of the human shields. Some of them are crazy," said an Iraqi Foreign Ministry official, who requested anonymity.

Flying to Iraq and placing yourself between bombs and a power station. I wonder if they think people will respect their actions? I certainly don't think they're very smart. Down right dumb if you ask me. Write an editorial. Carry out a peacefull protest march. Explain to me how how 12 years of "peaceful solutions" to Saddam haven't removed him from power but we should keep trying them. Better yet, go live in pre-invasion Iraq and then tell me what you think.

posted @ Saturday, March 22, 2003 11:35 AM | Feedback (0)
Some interesting comments in from Iranian students about the invasion of Iraq:
The "Great Satan" has invaded Iraq but students at Tehran University seem pleased at the prospect.

"It will be a good thing to have American troops in Iraq. Perhaps that will bring change to Iran," said Namin, a lanky engineering student strolling to class.

"Maybe that will put more pressure on the regime here." Unlike fellow Muslims in the Middle East or their predecessors 23 years ago who seized the United States embassy, students today are not seething with anger against America and are unmoved by the government's daily references to "the enemy" in Washington.

Iran has been gradually moving toward more freedom for their people. Hopefully they'll keep moving that way.
posted @ Saturday, March 22, 2003 11:29 AM | Feedback (0)
Great comments from a British officer on the eve of the invasion.
"We go to liberate not to conquer. We will not fly our flags in their country," he said.

"We are entering Iraq to free a people and the only flag which will be flown in that ancient land is their own. Show respect for them.

His whole speech is pretty moving. Thanks Chris.

posted @ Thursday, March 20, 2003 1:22 PM | Feedback (0)
The Times of London is echoing the Annanova report with more details.
The reports, which are updated at least four times daily and distributed among senior British and US officers paint a picture of the dying hours of Saddam's 30-year iron grip on Iraq as it finally and dramatically falls apart, even before the British and US invasion gets underway.

"We are looking at wholesale desertions in some areas," said an intelligence officer.

"In the southern area, where there are six Iraqi divisions, fifty per cent of their officers are planning to surrender once the campaign opens.

It looks like just putting on enough pressure may be enough to collapse the Iraqi army. I'm not sure what will happen to Iraq. If senior leaders are defecting the end is probably near. One wonders if Saddam will survive until American troops arrive.

posted @ Wednesday, March 19, 2003 8:24 PM | Feedback (0)
If this report is correct we're already winning the war. Iraq under Saddam surrenders faster than France.
In the south, Kuwaiti border guards are having to turn Iraqi soldiers back, telling them they must wait until the attack begins before they can surrender.
posted @ Wednesday, March 19, 2003 2:16 PM | Feedback (0)
Hmmm. Not sure what to make of this headline: FRENCH U-TURN ON IRAQ WAR
France has announced it could assist any US-led military coalition if Iraq uses chemical and biological weapons.

Are the French back-pedaling already? Do they realize they are totally irrelevant? That over 20 European countries support a regime change in Iraq? Especially those countries that lived under Communist rule? Do they acknowledge that Russia and Iraq have extensive business dealing and a regime change could cost Russia billions upon billions of dollars? Did they notice that Turkey is aiming for a $26 billion handout to use their bases? It's all about the money with the Europeans. France is just looking for someone to surrender to. Except that nobody cares what France wants anymore. Or whether they surrender or no.

posted @ Tuesday, March 18, 2003 9:28 PM | Feedback (0)
From the Times Online:
For more than 20 years, senior Iraqi officials have committed genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity. This list includes far more than the gassing of 5,000 in Halabja and other villages in 1988. It includes serial war crimes during the Iran-Iraq war; the genocidal Anfal campaign against the Iraqi Kurds in 1987-88; the invasion of Kuwait and the killing of more than 1,000 Kuwaiti civilians; the violent suppression, which I witnessed, of the 1991 Kurdish uprising that led to 30,000 or more civilian deaths; the draining of the Southern Marshes during the 1990s, which ethnically cleansed thousands of Shias; and the summary executions of thousands of political opponents.

Just thought I'd link to one more anti-Saddam article this morning.

posted @ Tuesday, March 18, 2003 5:49 AM | Feedback (0)
So head over to Google and type "French Military Victories" in the search box and then hit the "I'm Feeling Lucky" button. It's priceless.
posted @ Tuesday, March 11, 2003 9:39 AM | Feedback (0)
Slashdot has a review of The Space Elevator. It's a book that came out of a NASA review of the feasability of a space elevator.
Essentially a space elevator is a geosynchronous satellite with an unusually high aspect ratio. So high, in fact, that even though the satellite is in orbit over a fixed point on the Earth's surface, the lower portion of the satellite actually touches the surface of the Earth.

Image a three day elevator ride into space.

posted @ Saturday, March 08, 2003 9:38 AM | Feedback (0)
In police reports, Doughty said that he realized afterward that he shouldn't have shot his computer but at the time it seemed like the right thing to do.

I've always wanted to do that!

posted @ Wednesday, March 05, 2003 4:31 PM | Feedback (0)
And here's the cool photo of the day.
posted @ Wednesday, March 05, 2003 7:51 AM | Feedback (0)
Drew Gooden seems to be doing much better with the Magic than with the Grizzlies.
Gooden only averaged 5.8 rebounds for Memphis, so it bears watching to see whether he can sustain a double-digit rebound average over a long stretch of games. Then again, so much of why Gooden did not succeed as planned with the Grizzlies was because he was playing out of position, at small forward instead of power forward. Now he feels comfortable again.

Always helps when you play a guy at the right position.

posted @ Wednesday, March 05, 2003 7:36 AM | Feedback (0)
Happy 03/03/03!
posted @ Monday, March 03, 2003 2:30 PM | Feedback (0)