Posts
819
Comments
458
Trackbacks
51
The United Nations
I've been on a bit of an anti-United Nations kick for a while now. Especially since I read somewhere that we provide 22% of the budget for the UN. I'm thinking we should ask for our money back. Or at least stop funding some of the idiocy out there. Case in point:
The inequality and injustice of the treatment of Israel becomes most obvious in comparison with the U.N.'s treatment of human-rights violations elsewhere in the world. A U.N. General Assembly resolution on Iran could only be adopted last week after any notion of creating a single investigator into human-rights abuse in that country was eliminated. No resolution was even attempted on countries like China, where 1.3 billion people are without basic civil and political rights, or Saudi Arabia, where gross discrimination against women is endemic and more than a million female migrant workers are essentially slaves. Resolutions put forward on Sudan and Zimbabwe were prevented this week from even coming to a vote. The grand total of the GA's 2004 country-specific criticism of human-rights violations around the globe in the 190 U.N. members, excluding Israel: One resolution for each of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Iran, Myanmar, and Turkmenistan. It was on November 24 that the U.N. General Assembly defeated action on Sudan and Zimbabwe. Simultaneously, U.N. delegates in the adjoining room adopted nine resolutions condemning Israel.

This is from an article in National Review titled Fatal Failure. It really focuses on the hypocrisy of the United Nation's treatment of Israel. While the scandal with Kofi Annan unfolds its important to remember just what a messed up organization this is.

posted on Wednesday, December 01, 2004 2:15 PM Print
Comments
# RE: The United Nations
Scott Mitchell
12/1/2004 11:14 PM
Anytime you get a group of folks together whose position there has no bearing on their cumulative work there, and who have the opportunity for self enrichment through nefarious means, what do you expect?

What I propose is that UN members have a maximum time limit for which they can be working there, like two years. After that, they have to go. Furthermore, I think they should be elected from their citizenry, not appointed by some minister, president, or dictator.
Comments have been closed on this topic.